View Single Post
Old 03-09-2008, 05:14 PM   #20 (permalink)
CJR238
Scout-1
Advanced Radar Veteran
Points: 4,942, Level: 44 Points: 4,942, Level: 44 Points: 4,942, Level: 44
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
CJR238's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 623
CJR238 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RadarNutt View Post
Hmm.... now you've got me thinking... it would be great if someone would try that scenario in a test. I'll have to ponder that one... maybe I'll try out a "30 day test drive" and find out... would be interesting.

Question is do I have time to do it atm? But perhaps someone ought to do this and see how well it works.

What I mean is combo of the TrueLock blocking falses + how sensitive is it to a real threat? Because granted, with my V1 I would probably get nailed there because of all the false bogeys. I haven't seen K-band used in that particular area in years, so it's probably a non-issue. It's just that the whole situation got me thinking... what if I was in an area with K-band?

Anyway, definitely a test-worthy exercise IMHO.
X2, i don't have a location where there was 9 falses, but i locked out 2 in a location and way before i got there my 9500I alerted to a LEO running K band. So even if by small chance it somehow locked it out i was still alerted and i reacted quickly because i was use to no noise at that area.

Worth a real test though.

The 9500I always gets me thinking, it has so much stuff that interacts differently with different settings.
__________________
-RIP

9500I
8500
Wanted a spectre proof V1. Now I dont want a V1 anymore, too much bull.

9500I Explanation & TrueLock Info:
http://www.radarreviews.net/forums/showthread.php?t=56

9500I review:
http://www.radarreviews.net/gallery/?n=12
CJR238 is offline   Reply With Quote