View Single Post
Old 09-09-2008, 03:39 PM   #22 (permalink)
Subie_07

Junior Member
Points: 1,177, Level: 18 Points: 1,177, Level: 18 Points: 1,177, Level: 18
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Subie_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 178
Subie_07 is on a distinguished road
Default

TSI... You are taking what I said and stretching it out too far... all I said was you mistake the Laser Star for how long it has been on the road... I said nothing of comparing the Laser Star to the LI, EXCEPT on the fact that LI users Silicone and LS uses Epoxy and what that means to buyers and the effects it can have... You on the other hand stretched my comment to a comparison which it was not.

And NO your information is wrong again... the Laser Star was selling several months before the Review of LJTs... It had changed manufactures about 3 to 4 months prior to the review... so it was well into production at that point... and again I am not comparing it to the LI, I am correcting you on your information...

As far as on the Road Driving I agree ... only time will tell... but I have never seen any better build quality then the Laser Star. The LI also has pretty good build quality. So only time will tell...

You say there is holes in my argument ... but really you just stretch my words to be something they are not and create your own holes... Please next time ... just take what I said and do not assume anything else...

I always have answers TSI... I do not always wish to share them... I have my reasons and you can not convince me otherwise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSi+WRX View Post
And so has Laser Interceptor, in its previous iterations.

But neither of that really proves anything - it's the years-on-road and miles-on-road in mass-produced, production retail, format (and it cannot be denied that the LaserStar was only sold to the mass US public since last March/April, starting with the efforts of LaserJammerTests) that really matters (and to-wit, wasn't one of The Goons' main complaints about the LI and its initial testing by the GOL that it wasn't a mass-produced, full-retail version - so how come there can be criticism on one hand, when used in reference to its competitors, but that same criteria is used in its favor [to denote the amount of time that it's "been around"] when its proponents want to? is that fair?), and when it comes to this, no-one except Escort and Blinder, currently, has anything even remotely approaching acceptable "data."

So that rebuttal, Subie, was full of holes in its logic.....

But I commend you in that, for once, you answered a question directly - and did not try to deflect it with another question, or totally ignore it outright.
Subie_07 is offline   Reply With Quote