I notice that KITT replied, but since I have lameness on IGNORE, I'll have to guess his reply went something like, "Waaaa...your Pro-78 is modified...booo hooo....it doesn't represent actual production Pro-78 performance...waaaaaa."
But I've been getting around the curve results like this since before the 78 had even a single "tweak" from Michael B. Even when it had Rev B software.
Michael B's exact words when he returned it this time: "You may notice a slight increase in K- and Ka-band sensitivity." The rest was filtering stuff.
KITT's just a hater. Just to prove it, here are some diagrams of around-the-curve results I got before Michael tweaked a thing. Some are Rev B software, others are a very early beta version of Rev C:
Rev C Beta:
Rev C Beta (Radar was FORWARD-FACING):
Rev C Beta (this is a 3.5 - 3.9 mile detect..WITH a curve!):
Rev B:
Rev C Beta (TWO CURVES!):
None of those have any "tweaks" whatsoever. Stock Pro-78 with either Rev B or Rev C2 beta software.
Once again, it's not an X50/STi/V1 by any means, but around a curve, it's just fine.