View Single Post
Old 11-21-2007, 03:50 PM   #8 (permalink)
MetalFlame
Newbie Member
Junior Member
Points: 534, Level: 10 Points: 534, Level: 10 Points: 534, Level: 10
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
MetalFlame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SLOVENIA
Posts: 30
MetalFlame is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlos from Spain View Post
Interesting, then its the same flaw that the previous Autovelox 104 had. It comunicated between the measuring device and the CPU via radio, so it was detected with a device that detected that frecuency. Now the current Autovelox, the 105SE, comunicates via cable in order to avoid this, so its now 100% undetectable.
That is correct.

BTW,if I may...I saw your post about V1 freq. cover on TodoRadares and that info is not correct anymore,
because VR expanded Ka-band sweep in EURO-mode.
V1 before rev.3.851 in EURO-mode,covers from 34.26 to 34.46GHz
V1 after(July2006) rev.3.851 in EURO-mode,covers from 33.9 to 34.65GHz
Sorry,for bringing this here,I hope you don't mind.I tought you might want to know this.
__________________
V1-EURO-mode(K,Ka-narrow)
RX-65-my backup RD
UnidenUBC3500XLT-handheld scanner
Keep the metal flame burning!
MetalFlame is offline   Reply With Quote